“There’s a lot more drugs, vaccines and medicines you should not be taking and protesting if you’re really worried about these fetal cells being used,” Caplan said. They are commonly used in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries to test and create medications.Īrthur Caplan, a bioethics professor at New York University Langone Medical Center, said that people who oppose the coronavirus on religious grounds should also oppose numerous medications and vaccines developed over the past 30 to 40 years. Those cell lines, however, were isolated from two fetuses in 19 and then replicated numerous times over the ensuing decades. They did, however, use replicated fetal cell lines to test the effectiveness of their vaccines. Johnson & Johnson did use a replicated fetal cell line in the production of its vaccine, but Pfizer and Moderna did not. The second argument cites a Bible verse that claims that the human body is God’s temple of the Holy Spirit and argues that for that reason receiving a vaccine would be a sin. The Christian argument for religious exemptions follows two tracks typically: first, that the vaccine shots at some point in their production used aborted fetal cell lines. Individually held beliefs, however, could provide some protections. Pope Francis went so far as to say that getting vaccinated was “the moral choice because it is about your life but also the lives of others.” One driver for testing sincerity is the fact that no major organized religion objects to the vaccines, and Roman Catholic and other Christian, Jewish and Muslim leaders have advised followers to get the shots. “We have to test sincerity or else we have to accept them all or deny them all, so I think the courts will provide room for testing that.” “In cases where you’ve got a lot of potential insincere claims - and I think there’s evidence that is what’s happening here in which people are raising religious objections when they’re motivated by fear of the vaccine or political opposition to it - testing sincerity makes sense,” he said. Paul, Minnesota, said he believes that there is a strong case to deny many of the religious claims and to test religious sincerity. ![]() Thomas Berg, a self-described “strong supporter of religious exemptions” and a religious liberty advocate who teaches law at the University of St. Pope Francis went so far as to say that receiving the vaccine was 'the moral choice because it is about your life but also the lives of others.' ![]() They may even have to show a track record of opposition to receive an exemption. Matthew Hatcher / SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty ImagesĮxperts say that the threshold for religious exemptions could come down to proving whether the person attempting to obtain one has “sincerely held beliefs” against getting vaccinated on religious grounds. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital in Pontiac, Mich., on July 24. The challenge for governments and institutions is balancing American civil liberties with a worsening public health crisis. ![]() ![]() “It's certainly something we’ll see getting worked out in the courts.” “There are some First Amendment implications here and there’s a patchwork of laws that could potentially be implicated by these mandates,” said James Sonne, a law professor at Stanford Law School and founding director of its Religious Liberty Clinic. But experts anticipate that religious liberty challenges will pick up as more mandates are put in place - especially when there is no national standard. Only some federal agencies and states have made vaccinations mandatory for workers, and more private companies are doing or considering the same.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |